·
Nothing sacrosanct, he declares
President
Muhammadu Buhari and others before him, holding the position that Nigeria’s
sovereignty is non-negotiable are wrong Nobel laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka,
said on Tuesday, in Lagos.
Coming on the heels of
renewed agitation for the restructuring of the Nigerian federation, the
accomplished writer and vocal voice in national and international matters
told Punch newspapers, while visiting its corporate
headquarters in Lagos
|
Prof. Wole Soyinka |
Speaking during a visit
to PUNCH Place, the corporate headquarters of PUNCH Nigeria Limited, Kilometre
14, Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, Ogun State, that the decentralisation of the
nation would ensure healthy rivalry among the component units.
The laureate said it was
wrong for previous administrations in the country to say that Nigeria’s
sovereignty was non-negotiable, submitting that the position was antithetical
to development.
Soyinka added, “I am on
the side of those who say we must do everything to avoid disintegration. That
language I understand. I don’t understand (ex-President Olusegun) Obasanjo’s
language. I don’t understand (President Muhammadu) Buhari’s language and all
their predecessors, saying the sovereignty of this nation is non-negotiable.
It’s bloody well negotiable and we had better negotiate it. We better negotiate
it, not even at meetings, not at conferences, but everyday in our conduct
towards one another.
“We had better understand
it too that when people are saying ‘let’s restructure’, they have better things
to do. It’s not an idle cry; it is a perennial demand. The Pro-National
Conference Organisation was about restructuring when this same Obasanjo said it
was an act of treason for people to come together to fashion a new
constitution. Those were fighting words; that you’re saying, ‘I commit treason
because I want to sit with my fellow citizens and negotiate the structures of
staying together’ and ask the police to go and break it up and arrest us.
“I remember that
policeman, who said if we met, that would be treason. I wasn’t a member of
PRONACO at the time. That’s when I joined PRONACO. If you’re saying to me, ‘I
am a second-class citizen; I cannot sit down and discuss the articles, the
protocols of staying together’ and you’re trying to bully me, I won’t accept.”
He said Nigeria could not
continue with a centralisation policy, which encouraged what he described
as “monkey dey work, baboon dey chop”mentality.
Soyinka said the over
centralisation of government had resulted in resentment among constituent
states, adding that the phenomenon was insulting and promoted anti-healthy
rivalry among states.
He stated, “We cannot
continue to allow a centralisation policy which makes the constituent units of
this nation resentful; they say monkey dey work, baboon dey chop. And the idea
of centralising revenues, allocation system, whereby you dole out; the thing is
insulting and it is what I call anti-healthy rivalry. It is against the
incentives to make states viable.”
He said the
centralisation of government led to the proliferation of states during the
military era when, according to him, a state was created because the girlfriend
of a certain military leader hailed from the state.
He said it was high time
government established state police to check the rising security challenges in
the country, stressing that policing was more effective when localised.
Soyinka added, “I know
people get nervous about that expression. If you go to a place like England,
you sometimes see two, three, four police (officers) just walking casually
unarmed, but they are observing everything.
“Now, if policing is all
of that, then I think the police are more efficient if they are based within a
smaller constituency than a larger one. Within such constituencies, the
policeman virtually knows everybody. A federal, centralised system of police
lacks that advantage.
“So, I find it very
difficult to accept that people can be nervous about the state police. State
police has been abused. Nobody is denying that; it’s historical. Don’t tell us
because we know already. But isn’t centralised police also abused? Look at
what’s been coming out from the last elections, not just the police, but the
military.”
Condemning the killings
perpetrated by Fulani herdsmen across the country, the Professor of Comparative
Literature said the phenomenon had become an albatross that must be tackled
frontally by the Federal Government.
Soyinka said the
intrusive nature of Fulani herdsmen was no longer a remote problem for him
personally, alleging that some Fulani herdsmen had invaded the privacy of his
residence in Abeokuta, Ogun State.
“It is no longer a remote
problem for me. It is an actuality,” he said, recalling that the killings
carried out by suspected Fulani herdsmen in Enugu some months ago was
mismanaged by the government.
“In Enugu, why did it
take so long to investigate the killings? It’s like the case of Ese Oruru. What
is all this? What is security for? That thing should have been addressed
immediately. (In Enugu), they shouldn’t have waited for directives from Buhari
or anybody. This is a crime against humanity. There should be no debate about
it.
“The military should have
been drafted there immediately; the police, first of all, and the military – if
necessary. I found out that the victims were arrested; what’s all that about?
This menace is underestimated. If they had reached my secure place in Abeokuta,
then it is no longer a remote problem.”
He faulted the proposal
to create grazing reserves for herdsmen in the country, saying rather than do
that, ranches, where members of the public could go to buy cows and goats,
should be created.
The octogenarian said the
term “grazing reserve” would convey the meaning that government had carved out
some people’s land for herdsmen to use for their commercial enterprise.
“The word ‘reserve’
is the problem. If there are ranches, it doesn’t matter where they are built,
ranches are a commercial proposition, it isn’t a Fulani issue. You can create
ranches so that cows, goats could be bought there. This shouldn’t be an
instrument of politics, race or ethnicity.
“But when you talk about
reserves, it suggests that people can bring cattle from Futa Djallon, Senegal,
and if they get here, they can get reserve. If it’s a ranch, it’s a pure
commercial proposition, you want to trade. I will like to see these cattle
people go back to the position they were before in which there was mutual
collaboration between them and farmers,” he said.
Soyinka called on Buhari
to consider the report of the 2014 National Conference convened during the
tenure of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, lamenting that the country had been
moving round in circles without direction.
“We have a habit of
consigning files to the dust shelves and then we start all over again. The
(confab) report that came under Jonathan is even more superior to the one that
I participated in as a member of PRONACO and I think that should be addressed
seriously.
“The recommendations
strike me as workable, practical, and in fact, as answering some of the
anxieties of this nation. This is something I think that Buhari should tackle
seriously,” he said.
Source Punch/Whirlwind News