Prof. Chukwuma Charles Soludo |
Former Governor of Central Bank of
Nigeria (CBN), Prof. Chukwuma Charles Soludo has called on African leaders to
think outside the box and evolve a home grown strategy that will provide
solution to the problem of corona virus pandemic and ease the lock down that
comes in its wake.
Prof. Soludo believes that a strategy that includes lockdowns/border closure is
the worse of two options given the social and economic realities in the
continent.
Recalling that China isolated Wuhan, and
kept Shanghai, Beijing, and other major economic engines open, and today, China
supplies the world with medical equipment, face masks, etc and raking-in
hundreds of billions of dollars, the gifted economist declared: “The idea of a
lockdown (and border closure) implies that you will continue to do so (with
extensions) until such a time that you are satisfied that the spread of
Covid-19 has been arrested or on the decline (with the possibility of imposing
another round of lockdown if new infections surge).
“That is the catch: lockdown for as long as required
to stem the spread. The length of time required for such lockdowns to ensure
“effectiveness” in arresting the spread would make it near impossible in much
of Africa. If the strategy is to lockdown until infections stop/significantly
decline or so, then we would have a suicidal indefinite waiting game.”
He continued: “First, monitoring the spread requires
effective testing, and Africa cannot afford effective testing of its 1.3
billion people. New York State, with a population of 20 million and a budget of
$175 billion, is pleading with the US Federal Government to assist with testing
kits and facilities. Check out the number of testing centres and facilities in
each African country relative to their populations. A joke in the social media
narrated that the health minister of Burundi was asked to explain the miracle
in his country whereby the number of infections was reported as zero. His
response was: “it is simple: we don’t have any testing kits”. Besides, there is
stigma associated with the infection, and on the average Africans only go to
the hospital as the last resort. There are also asymptomatic cases, and only
the critically ill ones will report. So, there will always be massive
under-testing, and gross under reporting.
“Furthermore, social distancing in most parts of
Africa will remain impractical. From the shanties in South Africa’s townships
to the crowded Ajegunle or Mararaba in Abuja/Nasarawa, or Cairo or Kinshasa to
the villages and poor neighbourhoods in much of Africa, social clustering, not
distancing, is the affordable, survivalist culture. Communal living is not just
about culture, it is a matter of economic survival. Hence, the statistics on
infections will be coming in fits and stats: shall we be locking down and
unlocking with each episode of surge as there may probably be several such
episodes (unless and until a cure is found)? Even with over four weeks of “stay
at home” or lockdowns in some African countries, the reported daily infections
continue to rise. Some may argue the counterfactual that without the initial
lockdowns, the number of infections could have been multiples. It is a
reasonable conjecture or anecdote, albeit without any proof. The question is
the end game for a poor society such as Africa? New infections have re-emerged
in Wuhan, and both Singapore and South Korea are going back to the drawing
board. Since we cannot sustain lockdowns indefinitely or even until the spread
stops/declines, it means that we would sooner or later remove the restrictions.
What happens then? There would still be infections, which can still spread
anyway. Why not then adopt sustainable solutions early enough without weeks of
avoidable waste and hardship? Let us think this through!”
Besides, Soludo contends that African states cannot
pay for lockdowns. Many countries depend on budget support from bilateral and
multilateral donors, and with acute balance of payments problems. They do not
even have leg rooms to simply print money. Most are now begging for debt relief
and applying for urgent loans from the IMF and the World Bank. In Africa, both
the governments and the people are begging for “palliatives”.
And given that no government in Africa can seriously
pay for lockdowns, over one billion Africans are left to survive if they can or
perish if they must, especially at a time that African economies are facing
their worst economic condition in decades, where commodity prices have fallen
dramatically, and for oil producers, the situation is precarious.
Soludo said: “Each day that any of the major African
economies stays under lockdown costs Africa billions of dollars in lost income
but with debatable benefits. Given its financial and structural weaknesses,
Africa does not have the luxury of using the same “conventional tools” of the
western countries in the face of the twin pandemic. At the minimum, Africa
needs its full population (its most important asset) working at full throttle
to have any chance of defeating the impending economic catastrophe.”
On the way out, he said: “We should think African but
act locally and opportunistically to survive and prosper, and exploit the
global opportunities offered by the crises. Every shock or pandemic presents
opportunities. Solutions need to be multidimensional, far beyond economics and
western medicine. Ad-hoc response will be a wasted opportunity. Africa needs a
package for creating sustainable prosperity in a world of continuous
techno-economic-health disruptions.
“As a first step, African countries should urgently
dismantle the border closures as well as the stay at home/lockdown orders. Every
African society has some local herbs that, to use President Trump’s phrase,
“might help”. While the UK and others are experimenting with vaccines, you
never know if an Africa herb might be the cure. Necessity is the mother of
invention, and only those who dare, succeed! With enough education and
mobilization, the infection rate will be drastically reduced without pausing
the lives of 1.3 billion people.
For Soludo, the real challenge is the potential
economic catastrophe that many African economies face. How policymakers respond
depends on how they interpret the shocks: as temporary or permanent structural
shifts. But howsoever they choose to see it, one thing is certain: several more
similar shocks (not necessarily in exact form) are on the way.
No comments:
Post a Comment