Mr. Femi Falana, SAN |
Human rights activist and legal luminary, Mr. Femi Falana (SAN) has
joined issues with the Federal Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Mr.
Abubakar Malami (SAN) over the attorney generals declaration that Amotekun, a
security outfit set up by South West governors is illegal.
Debunking the claim in a statement, Falana who called on South West
governors to ignore the Federal Attorney General’s remarks, stated that “Malami’s purported
proscription of Amotekun is hypocritical and discriminatory on the grounds that
the Civilian JTF operating in Yobe and Borno states is constituted by 26,000
well-armed volunteers who have been assisting the armed forces to combat
terrorism in the north east region.
“Similarly,
the governments of Kano and Zamfara states have established the Hisbar
Commission. It is common knowledge that the Hisbar operatives in Zamfara state
recently arrested a policeman who was alleged to have been caught in the
company of three women. The Lagos State government has equally established the
Neighbourhood Watch to assist the Police and other security agencies in
protecting the life and property of every person living in Lagos,” Falana said.
Below is Mr Falana’s
full statement.
Before the official
launch of Amotekun at Ibadan, Oyo State, last week, the Inspector-General of
Police, Mr. Ibrahim held a meeting with the south-west governors represented by
Gov Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti State. At the end of the meeting the Police endorsed
the security initiative. By virtue of section 318 of the Constitution the word
“government” is said to include the Government of the Federation, or any State,
or of a local government council or any person who exercises power or authority
on its behalf. Thus, through the Inspector-General of Police the federal
government has ratified the establishment of Amotekun. Therefore, the statement
of the Attorney-General of the Federal Government that he was not consulted
before the establishment of Amotekun is totally uncalled for and ought to be
ignored by the south-west governors.
With respect, Mr
Malami’s purported proscription of Amotekun is hypocritical and discriminatory
on the grounds that the Civilian JTF operating in Yobe and Borno states is
constituted by 26,000 well-armed volunteers who have been assisting the armed
forces to combat terrorism in the north east region. Similarly, the governments
of Kano and Zamfara states have established the Hisbar Commission. It is common
knowledge that the Hisbar operatives in Zamfara state recently arrested a
policeman who was alleged to have been caught in the company of three women.
The Lagos State government has equally established the Neighbourhood Watch to
assist the Police and other security agencies in protecting the life and
property of every person living in Lagos.
No doubt, section 214 of
the Constitution stipulates that there shall be only one police force in
Nigeria. But the federal government has breached the Constitution by setting up
other police forces. For instance, the Nigerian Security and Defence Corps is
another police force established by law. The State Security Service is also a
police force established by law. Its operatives are well-armed. They wear masks
even in broad daylight. The federal government has also authorised the
officials of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, the Independent
Corrupt Practices and Offences Commission, Nigeria Customs Service, Nigeria
Correctional Service and other paramilitary agencies to bear arms. To that
extent, the federal government cannot stop any state from setting a security
outfit. In fact, having lost control of the monopoly of violence to armed gangs
in the various parts of the country the federal government lacks the legal,
political and moral right to challenge security outfits set up by state
governments and individuals to protect the lives and property of the people of
Nigeria.
It is pertinent to point
out that as chief security officers in the respective states, governors have
the power to adopt measures deemed fit within the ambit of the law to ensure
the maintenance of law and order. In Attorney-General of Anambra State
v Attorney-General of the Federation (2005) 9 NWLR (Pt 931) 572 the
Supreme Court held that, “The Constitution in section 215 subsection (1)
clearly gives the Governor of Anambra State the power to issue lawful direction
to the Commissioner of Police, Anambra State in connection with securing public
safety and order in the State.”
In Inspector-General
of Police v ANPP (2008) 12 WRN 65 it was held by the federal high
court that police permit for rallies was illegal and unconstitutional and that
the governor is the appropriate authority who may delegate powers under the
Public Order Act to a Commissioner of Police for the purpose of convening any
meeting or rally. It was further held that the Inspector-General of Police
cannot exercise any power under the Act. The decision was upheld by the Court
of in All Nigeria Peoples Party & Ors. v. Inspector General of
Police (2008) 12 WRN 65.
As tribunal of enquiry
is not provided for in either the Exclusive or Concurrent Legislative List it
is a residuary matter. Hence, in Chief Gani Fawehinmi v. Ibrahim
Babangida (2003) 12 WRN 1 the Supreme Court held that the power to set
a Tribunal of Inquiry is vested in state governors and that the power of the
President to institute a commission of enquiry under the Tribunal of Enquiry
Act is limited to the Federal Capital Territory.
In view of the aforesaid
decided cases of our courts the Federal Government does not have exclusive
control over law and order in any of the 36 states of the Federation. No doubt,
Mr. Malami has anchored his controversial legal opinion on section 227 of the
Constitution which provides that “No association shall retain, organise, train
or equip any person or group of persons for the purpose of enabling them to be
employed for the use or display of physical force or coercion in promoting any
political objective or interest or in such manner as to arouse reasonable
apprehension that they are organised and trained or equipped for that purpose.”
Since Amotekun is not an
outfit set up by south west governors to harass or intimidate political
opponents it cannot be prohibited under section 227 or any other provision of
the Constitution. In other words, the Constitution has not prohibited the
establishment of security outfits for the defence of the people of Nigeria.
However, if Mr. Malami is convinced that his position is backed by law he
should approach the Supreme Court to test the constitutional validity of
Amotekun. Meanwhile, the governments of Ekiti, Ondo, Osun, Ogun and Oyo states
are advised to ignore Mr. Malami’s purported proscription and proceed to enact
the necessary laws similar to the Neighbourhood Watch Law of Lagos State.
No comments:
Post a Comment