INTERVIEW - LABOUR
·
It’s
wrong to cut workers’ allowance
·
Can’t
explain why NLC is not active in Delta State
·
Individual
unions now carry their crosses
(Banner Media Network
last month had an encounter with the Public Relations officer (PRO) of the
Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN), Delta state chapter,
Comrade Egalase Afure). In that encounter, the PRO fielded questions on issues
affecting labour. Below are details of the interview)
.
Q: We have heard
grumblings among civil servants in Delta state against the removal of the
Special Duty allowance (SDA) by the State Government. Interactions with some
civil servants show that they are bitter, and angry because of the removal of
the SDA. As a union leader why is this so?
Ans: That SDA is
actually called Legislative Duty allowance in the House of Assembly. As the
first arm of government, we have the legislative duty allowance which is now
called SDA paid to legislative staff all over the federation. It was an
agreement that was reached between the national body of the Parliamentary Staff
Association of Nigeria (PASAN), and the National Assembly. It actually was
supposed to be 35 percent of your annual basic salary. But during the regime of
our former governor, James Ibori, an approval was given for 25 percent for the
legislative staffs; 25 percent of their basic salary was approved. Instead of
the 35 percent, the union accepted so that the work of the legislators can move
on. So, the legislative duty allowance is a special allowance meant for special
functions that are performed by the legislative staffs. You will agree with me
that during budget presentation, and oversight functions of the various
committees they work beyond 4 0’clock in the evening. They even work during
public holidays and during weekends as the case may arise. So that necessitated
this legislative duty allowance.
It is not paid only in Delta state. It is paid all over the
36 states that have State House of assembly. It is a circular from the National
Assembly (NASS). So, we were surprised when we came to work one day and saw
that it was removed. That angered the staffs. And before now, we heard the
rumour that it was going to be removed. So, here in PASAN at the local lever,
we were trying to seek audience with the Speaker. But I don’t know the
orientation that the Speaker has. He does not want to meet with labour leaders.
He will always refer labour leaders to the Clerk of the House. And there are certain
things that the Clerk can do. We know the limits of her powers. It is not every
matter that the clerk can handle because the Clerk is the accounting officer,
while the Speaker is the head of the legislature, the number three man in the
State. So, it is supposed to be an advantage to the union to discuss with the
Speaker, to make things easy for the staffs.
The refusal of the Speaker to see union leaders led to the
demonstration that took place about three weeks ago at the complex, immediately
we saw that the SDA was removed. And that brought him down from his office, and
he sought audience with the union. We made our positions clear to him, that by
the time we receive March 2016 pay slips, and SDA has not been restored, we
will close down the office. And we mean it.
It is not as if the union has been lingering away. The union
has been very active. But it is because of the recent management style that we
have; not wanting to meet with labour leaders. That is why you saw that the matter
rose to that extent. If not, the labour executives in the state House of
Assembly never wanted any form of demonstration. Unionism has grown beyond that
level of demonstration. What is done is to negotiate. When there are
challenges, you bring them before your management team for the purpose of
resolving matters. It is better for labour leaders. But a situation whereby you
have a management team that does not want to see labour, then the only option
is to go on strike.
But thank God he took action immediately; he referred the
matter to the House Committee on Establishment, headed by Hon (Prince ) Erijo,
who in his own wisdom summoned the Head of Service. And there was a meeting
between the HOS, the House committee on Establishment, and PASAN executives.
So, we sat, and on that day, the HOS denied any knowledge of the removal of
SDA. But when he saw the pay slip, he was showing surprise. And he promised
that it was going to be restored by the end of March 2016. And Hon. Erijo,
leader of the House committee on Establishment made the HOS to promise that the
arrears of the deducted SDA will be paid. Because he said what they were doing
was revalidation; that they did not stop the SDA. That they wanted to
revalidate, to ascertain those who are supposed to be involved in the payment.
So, the HOS promised that this March, 2016, it is going to be restored back to
staff salary. And we are waiting. (Editor’s note: The SDA has since been
restored by Delta state Government as promised.)
There are a lot of challenges facing the union here. We have
series of dead staffs. You can’t imagine that House of Assembly staffs who died
in the past six, seven years, the entitlements that are supposed to be paid to
their family members as contained in the civil service rule, have not been paid
to them. Normally, in the civil service, if a staff dies, it’s the
responsibility of the management of where he or she is working to pay for the
coffin, ambulance, do the necessary burial arrangements. There are certain
things the DTHA is supposed to do, but they didn’t do it. It’s like they don’t
regard the staff. So, a lot of issues and the SDA is just one.
Don’t be surprised to hear that up till now, the Speaker has
still refused audience with the staff union soon after that strike. So, we are
waiting. If we don’t see the SDA restored in line with all the other matters,
maybe we may end up closing up the Assembly.
Q: When Governor
Okowa came into power he cried out that the state of the finance of the state
was nothing to write home about. It appears he is seeking for ways to get
funds, and the SDA may first be one of the ways…
Ans: (Cuts in).
Cutting the staffs’ SDA is not the right way to get funds to manage government
affairs. It’s not the right thing for the governor to do. Start cutting civil servants’
salaries. It is wrong. Let me tell you one thing; we are doing a study in the
House of Assembly Service commission; we have seven members as commissioners.
The Chairman, first member, second member, like that. There are about seven of
them. We’ve done a study and we’ve seen that their take home pay a month is
above N4million for the seven of them. And we have 102 staffs in the service
commission. Their take home pay is about N7million. You check it. Seven members
in the Assembly Service commission, and 102 staffs. Look at the difference.
Seven point something million for 102 staffs, and four point something million
for seven members who are commissioners. Does it reflect that this state does not
have money? And we saw on the pages of newspapers, appointments here and there.
SAs on this, SSAs on that. We are not saying that politicians should not be
appointed. But the size of the executive should be cut down a little. If you
are saying that there is no money, then reduce the numbers of SAs and SSAs.
There are a lot of them that don’t have portfolios. But they have positions as
SAs; are you telling me that the governor is not paying them?
Just as he is dealing with civil servants, is that how he is
cutting down the allowances of politicians? I don’t think that is the right
thing. If we know that the executive is cutting down on its own expenses then
we will know that there is no money.
Q: What is the state
of the unions in Delta state? I ask this question because PASAN is an affiliate
of NLC. Recently, the NLC national mobilized support and carried out protest
against the increase in electricity tariffs. We didn’t see Delta NLC
participate in it. Does it mean that the unions in Delta State are happy with
the tariff hikes, and so will not support NLC national? Is NLC in Delta State
saying that Deltans are ok with the tariff increase?
Ans: My take is
that I don’t know what is going on with the NLC in Delta State, because I am
not too involved with them. The reason is that there was a time we led a protest
in this state. Though they came to support us, but at the end of the day, they
abandoned us. So, I see the situation in Delta State whereby individual
affiliate bodies of NLC are carrying their own crosses. I am using the PASAN
experience. Because the challenges we’ve been having, we’ve been reaching out
to NLC in the state, yet we don’t see anything positive they are doing for us.
Even when that strike was called, I was opportune to meet
with NLC Secretary, and I asked him: “Why did we not participate in the
national protest against electricity tariff increase?” He told me they
participated, but I know that they did not participate. Because if they
participated, and as the PRO of PASAN, I ought to have been there. But I was
not there. There was no directive; I did not receive any directive from the
state branch of NLC to go on that protest that was done against the electricity
companies.
I told the NLC Secretary that there are a lot of
expectations from the workers in the state from NLC. And the NLC is not living
up to that expectation. When the SDA matter came up, we met them, and they did
not do anything. So we had to carry our cross by ourselves. I don’t know why
NLC in Delta State acted that way.
No comments:
Post a Comment